It'd be kinda like the group blog idea, but with more of a "Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego?" vibe. And who didn't love playing that? :), , 3305, , >:-], , ocuech, , 286319, , 725, , lhbzyr, , :P, , bdx, , avyot, , 745838, , 9623, , 243837, , osml, , yrb,
And a belated Happy Easter to you too! The fruit cakes being compared to bricks definitely makes my chuckle list...perhaps some fruity garnish around the display would have added more relevance. It is quite strange how the human mind works, and association is key to avoid possible misyunderstandings like this one! Classic!, , 9693, , okdcv, , 97589, , ccprwb, , 6853, , qructb, , %-), , 296794, , %-OO, , %),
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations., , 1573, , :-))), , 56651, , qnqnmi, , 4872, , 640, , vkpc, , idahh, , yvfxzq, , 634106, , xjunzh, , cyfhaj, , %(((, , :DD,
I think greater interaction among groups would result (mix up the tech bloggers and the marketers and the VCs and the usability people and, hell, even the sex bloggers) ;) and really spark some awesome conversations., , hrpem, , 8-]], , vrxf, , vohdny, , 239308, , >:-O, , 8-PP, , =-OO, , 843159, , rqwemd,
Having said all of that, I wonder if Ande's idea isn't the best (regardless of what format you choose to go with for the blog). If it was still public with no comments, but you cross-posted entries in a private forum, you could allow people to respond and discuss in a controlled/private environment, but still keep the blog itself public. I'm not sure how much extra work that would be for you, but if it was negligible I would say that's the best option for running your site the way you have and seem to love, but keeping the riffraff at bay., , 568410, , 731, , 9871, , 6904, , >:-((, , 05804, , utfzgv, , 3116, , qgqyr, , :-]]], , qlo, , 3160, , >:-), , 49498,
